Are We Fatter Than We Think? - Retirement Net by Dr. Matthew Edlund, MD, MOH

The Retirement Net Premier retirement living featuring retirement communities and retirement homes in planned active developments. Worldwide resource for active retirement senior communities, rv/resort homes, vacation homes and assisted living facilities. The Retirement Net is the most comprehensive resource of premier retirement communities throughout the world featuring site built homes, manufactured homes, assisted living facilities, planned active retirement communities and various retirement properties worldwide. See also: senior housing, retirement communities, retirement living, elder care network.

Community Search:


Are We Fatter Than We Think?

Add Article To Favorites   0 Recommendations

And if we are: what can be done about it?

Posted June 1, 2012

A recent study in PLOS 1, an online journal of medicine, argues that Americans are far more obese than present standards of obesity, defined by body mass index, imply.

In a study of 9000 patients in a New York private practice, at least 39% of those classified as overweight are thought to be truly “obese.” The authors, who include the new New York State health director, argue that new cut-offs of BMI 24 for overweight and 28 for obesity should be made, and that our obesity epidemic is far worse than the disaster we already think it is.

Does This Study Compare Apple and Oranges?

Yes—though more accurately, it compares “apples” with “pears.” Where fat is distributed makes a big difference in overall health. Fat around the abdomen, making for apple shapes, is far more prognostically ominous than a “pear” shape where fat is distributed more in the buttocks, hips and shoulders.

How Was the New Estimate of Obesity Made?

By two measures—a DXA scan, which looks at total fat throughout the body, and leptin, a “hunger” hormone that correlates according to the authors pretty well with DXA scan results.

How is Obesity Defined by DXA Scans?

For men, more than 25% of body weight coming from fat equals “obesity”; the percentage required for women is 30%. Especially as people got older—and lost muscle mass—DXA scans came up with higher proportions of obesity than BMI did.

Is This A New Controversy?

No. People have been arguing that BMI is obsolete for a very long time. They point out that visceral fat—the stuff around organs—is an endocrine gland that produces more of itself, along with higher rates of diabetes, atherosclerosis, and increased mortality. Fat in other places does not appear as dangerous.

Why Does BMI Get Used So Much?

History and communality of use. Because it’s used by governments and insurance companies to define their populations—and what they will and will not pay for, for example, in bariatric surgery. And it’s pretty easy for people to measure their weight and their height and then come up with this number.

Is BMI a good public health indicator?

It certainly is an indicator, but others that are equally easy to use are probably more useful in telling you whether people will get sick or not.

What Other Tests Are More Predictive?

Many British and other researchers prefer measures of height versus waistline, particularly as waist size tends to be a better predictor of future health. One simple measure—waist size as less than half of height—seems a pretty good predictor of future heart and metabolic disease.

What Can Be Done?

1. Recognize that fat is not just plain “fat.” There is white fat, brown fat; fat on the hips and fat around abdominal organs (visceral fat). All have different implications for health and prediction of future health.

For example, you want to convert white fat to brown, which burns more quickly. You want to have less visceral fat—with its strange syndrome of TOFI—thin outside, fat inside. You want to keep moving whenever possible, as physical activity is often helpful, even necessary, in decreasing visceral fat—and converting white fat to brown.

2. Realize that all health measures have multiple implications—for individual health, public health, insurance companies, payment schedules, as well as public perception—as in what constitutes obesity.

3. Use health measures in ways that truly support individual and public health. Many folks are deeply focused on weight rather than what’s inside their body; many a model leads a profoundly unhealthy lifestyle. Many human shapes can be healthy, along with different cuisines and exercise types.

But when you want to know what something means, you look at its long term health implications. Waistlines may be more important in this way than weight.

And they’re easy to measure.

Dr. Matthew Edlund, M.D., M.O.H., is an internationally recognized expert on rest, sleep, and body clocks. His books include The Body Clock Advantage, Designed to Last, and Psychological Time and Mental Illness. His new book, The Power of Rest, shows that rest is a skill that rebuilds, renews, and rewires mind and body, and can increase productivity, health, and pleasure. For more information, visit his website, You can also subscribe to his new Fitcast via the iTunes Store.


Comments (0)

Add A Comment

Want to leave a comment? Sign in.

America's Top 100 Best Master-Planned Communities

My Saved Searches

Sign In or Create your free account to see your saved searches.


Welcome, Guest!   Sign InSign Up